Thursday, April 30, 2009

State of Play Review



Russell Crowe plays old-school journalist Cal McAffrey in this big-screen adaptation of the popular Brit-TV miniseries. While the script on this thriller is a bit too convoluted to pull the viewer in on its own merits, the ensemble cast has enough heart and soul to keep us vested for the duration, especially Crowe, who recasts the image of the hard-boiled ace. Rachel McAdams, Helen Mirren and Jason Bateman bring their A-game as well, ensuring even the most anemic presence (Ben Affleck) doesn't bring down the whole exercise.

Starring : Russell Crowe, Rachel McAdams, Ben Affleck, Helen Mirren, Jason Bateman and Robin Wright Penn.

Rating: Three and a half stars out of five

Political scandal, government corruption, unsavory sexual trysts and more liars in each frame than a photo album full of Wall Street hucksters, State of Play has just about everything a great movie needs -- and a whole lot more.

This new movie from The Last King of Scotland director Kevin Macdonald features a competent news reporter as the central protagonist.

Back in the old days of healthy mass media, finding a newsies in the leading role wasn't a big deal. If anything, it practically bordered on cliche. But now that legitimate newsgathering is bordering on obsolescence and growing numbers of respected journalists find themselves out of work, seeing a bona fide scribe as a larger-than-life screen hero is enough to make an aging movie critic rejoice.

Granted, a lot of the goodwill State of Play generates in its opening scenes is really a matter of nostalgia as we watch bedraggled journalist Cal McAffrey scoot around D.C. in his rusty old Saab, but so what?

Few characters in all of filmdom are as compelling as a cranky, rude, but always noble journalist capable of sniffing out a juicy scandal faster than a truffle pig. And in the capable hands of Russell Crowe, even the most jaded viewer will be reduced to cynic putty as he single-handedly jump starts the sputtering image of the big city reporter with commitment and compassion.

The script isn't always there to meet the challenge, but with Matthew Michael Carnahan's fingerprints on any draft there's always a risk: Carnahan wrote two of the most painfully self-conscious scripts produced over the past decade in Lions for Lambs and The Kingdom.

You can feel Carnahan's talent for lacklustre pretension lurking behind the lines and a near-incomprehensible plot, but thanks to the endless depth of the onscreen talents and Macdonald's intuitive direction, State of Play manages to overcome its internal weakness by pulling together a compelling stream of dramatic moments.

These moments lack a larger context for the better part of the film, but being slightly confused over the course of a sleuth story is an inherent part of the experience.

We have to put the pieces together in tandem with the onscreen problem-solver, and in this case, it means watching Crowe crawl through one political wormhole after another as he attempts to find out what happened to a young researcher and aide working on the Hill.

Sonia Baker (Maria Thayer) was working for Congressman Stephen Collins (Ben Affleck) when she appears to have been thrown under a train -- literally.

The cops can't get ahead in the investigation because the accident happened in a security camera blind spot, but Washington Globe reporter Cal McAffrey (Crowe) has a special source: Stephen Collins.

The two men once shared a dorm room together in college, and even competed for the same gal (Robin Wright Penn), but now they need to share information because Collins' political career is on the precipice: He was having an extra-marital affair with the dead woman, and if the media discover she was pregnant, his image as a moral standard-bearer will be destroyed.

When McAffrey starts digging into the dirt, he exposes some strange government roots to the story because Baker, the dead aide, was conducting research on a private corporation bidding on the Homeland Security contract.

Once McAffrey starts yanking on the subterranean tendrils, he pulls out a nest of collusion and corruption that tracks all the way into his own newsroom.

The story shivers with real world similarities, but because there are no "Eureka!" moments over the course of the narrative, and there's no unveiling of a single enemy, the movie cannot sweep the viewer off his or her feet. You have to work for resolution -- just like Cal.

Crowe has no problem making us believe in his character. A little pudgy, a little quiet and entirely unkempt, Crowe looks like the last old-school journo standing -- and he seems to like it.

Rachel McAdams isn't given that much screen time, but in the character of daily blogger Della Frye, she cranks out added value as the foil to McAffrey's old-fangled ways. A little more repartee and witty banter would have gone a long way with these two characters. By the same token, a little less screen time for the ever-leaden Ben Affleck would have been welcome, as well.

State of Play has flaws and some of them, like Affleck's wet toast presence, nag for the duration.

Fortunately, there are some wonderfully smart and funny moments lurking around each corner -- in addition to a palpable love of newspapers frothing in each frame -- to keep State of Play lurching forward. It's not pretty. It's not even graceful, but the film is desperate to prove it's got heart and soul in a wasteland of modern mass media.

Hannah Montana: The Movie Review



A harmless and cheery musical adventure for ‘tweens who love both Miley Cyrus and her alter-ego, the rock star Hannah Montana. There are new songs, a cute boy and farm animals. For structural analysts, though, the movie raises other questions. For example, is a teenage singer playing a teenager playing a singer a post-modern commentary on fame, an indulgence in it, or just an excuse for a new album?

Starring: Miley Cyrus, Billy Ray Cyrus, Taylor Swift

Rating: 3 stars out of 5

There are actually two movies in Hannah Montana: The Movie. The first is a musical adventure starring Miley Cyrus as a rock star who goes back to her native Tennessee, sings lots of songs, meets a cute boy and eventually kisses him -- although we don't see much of that because, like, yuck. The second is a post-modern analysis of identity as it pertains to celebrity, and of its psychic cost. It's totally, like, self-referential.

Hannah Montana No. 1 will probably satisfy its core audience, the ‘tween girls who regard the entire Hannah experience -- Miley Cyrus starring as Miley Stewart, a country girl whose alter ego is Hannah Montana, famous rock star -- in the way their parents thought about the Patty Duke show, in which an actress played both herself and her identical cousin: as an elaborate game of dress-up. Miley wears her great clothes (glitter in L.A., country casual in Tennessee), sings hummable pop tunes, and gets into various jams, mostly because she's just trying to be nice to everyone. She's helped out by her indulgent but wise father Billy Ray Cyrus, who is, of course, Miley's real-life father. In the Hannah Montana world, just like in a Charlie Kaufman movie, life imitates art imitates life.

This Hannah Montana is a lark: Miley has gone all Hollywood (the last straw is a fight in a shoe store with Tyra Banks over a pair of to-die-for high heels) and so dad takes her back home to Crowley Corners, Tenn., as part of what he calls Hannah detox. "You can't take Hannah away from me," cries Miley, a Dr. Jekyll longing for her Mr. Hyde, but eventually she learns about down-home values and puts on a big show to save the local meadow from the evil developer who wants to put up a giant mall ("Will there be a Bloomies?," asks Miley, letting her inner Hannah show through.)

There are also several new Miley Cyrus tunes, including a hip-hop-tinged hoedown number that has them all dancing in the barn. No one realizes that Miley is really Hannah because she takes off her wig and changes her outfit: in this respect, Miley is like Clark Kent, who fooled people for generations by removing his glasses and pulling down a lock of hair whenever he became Superman. There is also the matter of Travis (Lucas Till), the cute-as-a-button farmhand who never got over his Grade 1 crush over young Miley, but who isn't sure about Hannah.

The second Hannah Montana will be of more interest to students of Sigmund Freud, if not Swifty Lazar: when Miley becomes Hannah she also takes on an air of vacuity and entitlement, characteristics that are enabled by agents and fans because she is a famous singer. The villain in this story is the very idea of fame, represented by Oswald (Peter Gunn), a British tabloid reporter who skulks around trying to besmirch Hannah by revealing the dark secret that she's Miley Stewart from Tennessee. The only reason this could be a scandal is that a revelation of decency would undermine a musical career, but Miley is saved by the wisdom of the crowd: the climax of the film comes when they cheer for Miley to indulge her hidden identity.

The question for cultural analysts (and tabloid reporters) is how much of this mirrors the real life of Miley Cyrus. Is Hannah Montana: The Movie a commentary on the price of success or just an excuse for a new album? If fame is the villain, what does this mean for Miley, both the real one and the one she is playing? Or are they really that different? Hannah Montana: The Movie goes off the rails in its final half-hour in a long sequence where Miley has to keep two dates at once, changing clothes on the run: it's deadly as farce, but telling as commentary. The Hannah Montana fans out there will probably be dancing in the aisles, but Hannah Montana: The Movie is in a way a cautionary tale about answered prayers. Once they've cheered your inner Hannah, can you ever be Miley again?

Ghosts of Girlfriends Past Review



Hunky Matthew McConaughey plays a womanizing photographer who almost destroys his brother's wedding with his musings on the stupidity of love. Then three ghosts take him through his romantic past and he realizes he really is in love with bridesmaid Jennifer Garner. It's Scrooge with chest muscles, a vacuous trifle that doesn't quite rise to the level of disappointment.

Starring: Matthew McConaughey, Jennifer Garner

Rating: 2.5 stars out of 5

One of the danger signs in a movie is when the weather on screen -- in the case of Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, a snowy New England winter -- doesn't match the weather outside (sunny, with rainy periods). It means the film has been delayed past its ideal release date, in this case December, when its Christmas Carol theme would make more sense.

Another danger sign in a movie are the words, "Starring Matthew McConaughey."

Nevertheless, here we are, watching McConaughey in Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, a Dickens-inspired tale -- sort of Scrooge with chest muscles -- of a devilish womanizer named Conner Mead who is visited by three ghosts on the eve of his brother's wedding and learns that love and cuddling are more important than having sex with a lot of gorgeous models whom you never phone again. It's an important thing to know, although, come to think of it, it has nothing to do with Christmas, either. Maybe May is the perfect release date, after all.

Connor (MM himself, he of the twinkly eyes, firm pecs and amoral charm) is a fashion photographer who, in a strange twist of fate, is even more gorgeous than his models. We see him seducing women left and right and saving time by breaking up with old girlfriends on a conference call. ("I'm going to have to do this in bulk.")

Then it's off to the wedding of his brother Paul (Breckin Meyer) to Sandra (Lacey Chabert), a situation that Connor views with alarm and cynicism. Love is a myth, he tells everyone at the wedding party -- Connor Mead is in the running for Worst Best Man Ever -- and meant for the weak.

Things change when he meets the ghost of his late Uncle Wayne (Michael Douglas, looking exactly like the ghost of somebody's late Uncle Wayne), a ladies' man famous for his week-long orgies and the party where Dean Martin sang the Canadian national anthem in Spanish. This might be funnier if it was the American national anthem ("Jose can you see . . ."), but it's always nice to be mentioned.

It turns out that Uncle Wayne taught Connor everything he knows about being a jerk ("the power of a relationship lies with whoever cares less") and the three ghosts -- of girlfriends past, present and future -- show Connor he has been running away from his feelings for Jenny (Jennifer Garner, looking fetching if slightly long-jawed), his childhood sweetheart. Connor's problems seem to have started on the night when he was afraid to ask Jenny to dance at the school prom, causing a heartache that drove him to become, well, Matthew McConaughey. This is dubious psychology but very handy; anything deeper would just spoil things.

To care very much about this, you'd have to care whether Connor and Jenny will get together, but Ghosts of Girlfriends Past bangs around in such an empty artifice that you find yourself settling back into a sort of unchallenged numbness. Connor is so unlikely -- so removed from his feelings, so unaware, so impossible -- that nothing in the film feels remotely real.

Characters and jokes rattle around hopelessly, as wedding cakes and hearts are broken and repaired with equal facility. Since there's nothing at stake, you can distract yourself with the details of the wedding: the decor, the dresses, the structure of the toasts. It's pleasant enough, although it has very little to do with movie-going.

Ghosts of Girlfriends Pasts ends with a rare romantic-comedy exacta, the scared-straight redemption, combined with the race to the airport to save the wedding. Throw in the mandatory McConaughey-with-his-shirt-off scene, and you have the best Christmas-in-May movie of the season. God save us, everyone.

Obsessed Review


Fatal Attraction strikes again, this time with an innocent man being targeted. Idris Elba plays a businessman happily married to Beyonce Knowles, who is stalked by a smitten office temp (sexy Ali Larter) who has delusions that he wants an affair. The sexual and racial politics are cast aside in favour of an improbable plot that is endlessly irritating: it's a long wait until the Beyonce character finally gets to whup some ass.

Starring: Beyonce Knowles, Idris Elba, Ali Larter

Rating: 2 stars out of 5

The beautiful temptress. The married man. The wife who sits around at home biding her time until she finally gets to say something like, "You think you're crazy? I'll show you some crazy. Just try me bitch." No, it's not Fatal Attraction: it's worse. This is Obsessed, a sort of interracial twist on a formula that seems designed not to terrify us, but to be so irritating that we're somehow compelled to watch.

Personally, I was compelled to watch because it's my job, but if you want irritating, this is your destination. From the opening sequences of Obsessed to the part near the end when Beyonce Knowles -- playing Sharon, the angry wife -- finally gets to open that can of whup-ass, this is a thriller to make you squirm in your seat, waiting for the inevitable to trickle its way through the layers of the improbable, the impossible, the indigestible and for the thing to be over. I'll show you some crazy: let's take a walk through Obsessed.

Idris Elba, the hunk from The Wire, stars as Derek, a big, handsome, successful financial adviser who, on his way to work one day, rides the elevator with Lisa (Ali Larter from Heroes), a leggy blond with a flirtatious eye. She obviously likes Derek even though he is happily -- no, make that deliriously -- devoted to Sharon, their cute child, their beautiful new home and their semi-perfect life.

Lisa, though, has other ideas. She is delusional, and she begins a campaign of stalking Derek that includes a sexy assault in the stall of a men's bathroom, a sudden appearance in her underwear in the parking garage, and eventually a full-on campaign of appearing suddenly in low-cut dresses. Derek, meanwhile, doesn't tell his wife or his superiors what's happening: Obsessed is one of those films where people are always being interrupted at the last minute just as they're about to reveal some key plot point.

It's the last refuge of the indifferent screenwriter, although the perp in this case is David Loughrey, whose Lakeview Terrace placed a black-and-white time bomb under the thriller genre. Here, race is an unstated theme; this is more about gender politics.

One of the reasons Derek can't talk about Lisa's sexual campaign against him is that he met Sharon when she was his secretary: the man has a history of seducing the help, part of a corporate culture that is expressed by all of his workmates, a leering group of men who regard extramarital sex and drunken abandon as hilarious benefits of the high-finance life.

Their idea of fun is expressed by Derek's friend Ben (Jerry O'Connell), whose report on the office Christmas party is, "Roger from acquisitions tossed his cookies on the Christmas tree." Ben is almost as irritating as Lisa and both of them make Roger from acquisitions look like Mother Teresa.

These are all just sidelights to the main event, however, which is watching Lisa get compulsively more nuts and waiting for Sharon to catch on. Beyonce, in a curly hairdo that has the effect of making her slightly less lush -- thus, for the purposes of the plot, more wifely -- doesn't have much to do in a role that calls for her to be alternately maternal and suspicious. Elba is busy trying to seem rational and hold off his stalker. That tilts the movie in favour of Larter, who has a bit of a Sharon Stone vibe; that is, the Sharon Stone of Basic Instinct, the gorgeous killer type. If she does her job well, she gets us to cheer for her comeuppance, but there was only a wan cheer in the tiny crowd that watched the movie at its opening-day performance.

It came when the film was over. And it came from me.

Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen Movie Trailer #3 HD


Release Date: June 24, 2009 (conventional theaters and IMAX)
Studio: DreamWorks Pictures (Paramount)
Director: Michael Bay
Screenwriter: Ehren Kruger, Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman
Starring: Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson, Kevin Dunn, Julie White, John Benjamin Hickey, Ramon Rodriguez, Isabel Lucas, John Turturro
Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Plot Summary: In the highly-anticipated "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen," debuting June 24, 2009, Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) again joins with the Autobots® against their sworn enemies, the Decepticons®. Michael Bay directs from a screenplay by Ehren Kruger & Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman.

CHECK OUT WHAT HAPPEN ON THE TRAILER PREMIERE




DOWNLOAD LINK
http://rapidshare.com/files/227760789/transformers_2.mov.html

17 Again Review



The blandly handsome Zac Ephron stars as a high school athlete who doesn't live up to his potential -- that is, he grows up to be Matthew Perry -- and so is magically transported back to high school. There he helps his own teenage children cope with life in a way that he couldn't as a grown-up. It's ineffectual, mostly because Ephron never seems to be anything but a nice kid who gets to be a nice kid all over again.

Starring: Zac Ephron, Matthew Perry, Leslie Mann, Thomas Lennon

Rating: 2 stars out of 5

Zac Ephron -- the David Cassidy of the 21st Century -- makes his grown-up movie breakout in 17 Again, a movie about a middle-aged guy who's disappointed in his life and magically becomes young again so he can return to high school and make things right.

There are a couple of interesting things about this concept. One is that it's the latest of what you might call the mulligan movies: films that give people the chance to do things over. Indeed, the previews before 17 Again feature Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, in which Matthew McConaughey gets to go back and do it right this time. There's even a scene in 17 Again, featuring a man jumping off a bridge, that salutes the granddaddy of the mulligans, It's A Wonderful Life, in which Jimmy Stewart sees how the world would be without him.

This concludes the "interesting things" portion of our review.

We now must talk about Zac Ephron, whom we meet in the first scene as Mike, a high school basketball star in 1989, shooting hoops with no shirt on and preening in the manner of both a high school athlete and a movie actor who is painfully aware of his own appeal: hey everyone, I'm acting. Nice pecs, huh?

The story has Mike giving up a promising athletic career to marry his pregnant sweetheart Scarlett (Leslie Mann as an adult). Flash forward to 20 years later, and Mike has grown up to be Matthew Perry, a bizarre turn of events that is another good reason to eat your vegetables and stay off the junk food. Older Mike is disillusioned with his life and he and Scarlett are about to get divorced.

Through the magic of clunky screenwriting, Mike gets to go back and become his young self in the present day. That is, he becomes Zac Ephron again, back in school and going to classes with his own children, Alex and Maggie (Sterling Knight and Michelle Trachtenberg).

Unlike, say, Back to the Future, where Michael J. Fox had to arrange for his own parents to meet, 17 Again doesn't have much for nice, handsome Mike to do except be nice, handsome Mike all over again. He's the only one who has gone back in time, so while he feels bad because he did the right thing -- he married the girl -- he doesn't get a second chance to do the wrong thing and dump her, which would be the film's logical conclusion.

Being Mike a second time means only being Zac Ephron a second time. There's nothing parental about him, or misplaced; he's just a cool kid in school, where he looks like he belongs. (High schoolgirl looking at Mike: "If that boy was an apple, he'd be a delicious.") This is something new from Hollywood, the fish-in-water comedy.

Mike has to help his son find self-confidence and rescue his daughter from a bad relationship with the school bully, but in Ephron's performance, it's all done by a prettified but strangely asexual kid who has none of the angst of a man in mid-life crisis who suddenly regains his youth. His main problems come in some creepy subplots: Mike's daughter seems to be falling for him and he himself is still attracted to his wife, who is also the mother of his school friend.

The comedy you don't get from intimations of incest and cougardom comes from Mike's friend Ned (Thomas Lennon), a high-school nerd now grown up to be a computer billionaire nerd, who quotes Lord of the Rings, speaks Elf language and decorates his house with medieval weaponry. He's the kind of boy-man you see only in the pictures and he adds a note of irritation the movie really doesn't need.

If this is Zac Ephron's breakout, buckle your seatbelts for High School Musical 9.

Star Trek TV Spot #12 HD



CHECK OUT MORE HERE


Adventureland Review



Superbad director Greg Mottola writes and calls the shots on this comedy with dramatic ambitions. Set against the backdrop of a seedy amusement park, this ‘80s homage centres on James (Jesse Eisenberg), a nice college grad who has yet to lose his virginity. When he gets a job at the local fun park and meets Em (Kristen Stewart), he's hopeful his romantic fate will change -- but things don't turn out as planned, for James, or the audience. A largely familiar mix of virgin angst, the movie doesn't do much to reinvent the material, but the performers find enough traction to pull the movie home.

Starring: Kristen Stewart, Jesse Eisenberg, Ryan Reynolds, Kristen Wiig and Bill Hader

Rating: 3 stars out of 5

They promise blissful distraction, but amusement parks can seem like depressing monuments to human failure.

If they aren't dirt-stained seasonal operations with rusty rides, they're sterile odes to a lobotomized brand of utopia -- complete with creepy, big-eyed mascots and logo-laden merchandise.

Either way, they can evoke a sense of hopelessness in their inability to deliver genuine happiness, so the idea of setting a geek-friendly coming-of-age romance against this backdrop has immediate appeal.

Adventureland understands its seedy, bleach-scented locale, and because director Greg Mottola (Superbad) isn't afraid to take a slightly understated approach to the action, this teen-oriented comedy doesn't drift into the idle pool of boob and sex jokes -- even though talk of boobs and sex account for half the dialogue.

It all makes sense once you realize the plot of this "period ‘80s" movie revolves around James Brennan (Jesse Eisenberg), a university graduate and a frustrated virgin. James has big dreams of making it big in the big city, and basically making it at all, but before he can make the move to Manhattan -- he needs cash.

The only job he can get is at the local amusement park, where he's forced to wear a goofy T-shirt and work behind the games arcades.

Eventually, he hooks up with an assortment of other loners with age-appropriate angst, including a gangly guy with a pipe, a goof who pops him in the nuts, and a standoffish -- but secretly kind -- gal who helps him learn the ropes of Adventureland.

The latter character, Em (Kristen Stewart), finds something strangely endearing about the slouching James. The two start up a close friendship, but James fails to penetrate his new pal's private thoughts -- leaving him longing for something more, from someone. Anyone.

Because this is the geek universe, James lands a date with the hottest girl at the park, a feathered-hair number in acid-wash jeans named Lisa P. (Margarita Levieva), but the encounter doesn't end with the desired result.

James remains scoreless. Meanwhile, his good buddy Em is having an illicit affair with the one undeniably good-looking guy in sight: Mike Connell (Ryan Reynolds), the park handyman who strolls through the park with sunglasses and a guitar case.

He's a heartbreaker and a musical poser, but James can't help himself from admiring the man's skill set when it comes to the ladies. The same goes for all the other guys at the park, hence, all the talk of sex and boobies and perpetual carnal frustration.

The mix could be even more tedious than it sounds, if it weren't for the film's sentimental side. Director-writer Mottola creates a variety of quieter dramatic scenes that give the actors something interesting to deliver on screen -- whether it's in a brief shot of Stewart leaning against the walls of her family house, or a moment where bigotry forces an ensemble reaction.

Adventureland's central problem is a sense of deja-vu: We've all been on this ride before, and witnessed a young man's desperate attempt to be lose his virginity.

It's just hard to find something novel in virgin territory these days. Is there an inordinate number of frustrated non-fornicators in the film business (plausible), or does the public simply crave tales of wimpy guys obsessed about sex (also plausible, providing you aren't female)? That might well be one of those unanswerable questions about life and the universe.

Because the film has honest intentions and demonstrates a lingering affection for that brief moment between innocence and experience, it can't miss too big -- but there's no way it's going all the way, either.

Race to Witch Mountain Review



A bit of history first: There were two original Witch Mountain movies - "Escape to Witch Mountain" in 1975 and "Return from Witch Mountain" in 1978, along with a couple of TV movies in 1982 and 1995. So the franchise has a long history and a following among audiences who’ve seen those earlier movies.

"Race to Witch Mountain" isn’t so much a remake as it is a movie built around the concept of the early movies. In the first 1975 film, two alien kids land on Earth and fall into the clutches of an evil millionaire who wants to exploit them.

The new movie revolves around Jack Bruno (Dwayne Johnson), an ex-con cab driver in Las Vegas who finds two teens in the back of his cab one morning. Sara (AnnaSophia Robb) and Seth (Alexander Ludwig) are odd little people, talking in a robotic way and asking "Jack Bruno" – as they call him after seeing his name on his dashboard – to drop them off at a remote place in the desert.

Once there, some very odd things happen. The kids disappear into a rundown shack and Jack follows them, only to find some bizarre goings on. He eventually learns that they’re aliens from another planet, who’ve come to Earth with a specific task to complete.

Meanwhile, Jack knows just the person to help them: Dr. Alex Friedman (Carla Gugino) a UFOlogist who’s at a convention in Vegas. Jack seeks out her help to learn what’s going on, figure out who’s been chasing them, and get the kids back to their spaceship which is now being held at a secret facility known as … Witch Mountain.

"Race to Witch Mountain" isn’t the best movie you’ll see this year, but it’s entertaining, has some pretty cool special effects, and is a fun family movie. In the trailer, you’ll see one of the coolest fx, in which Seth is able to go through objects and stop moving vehicles with his body.

Dwayne Johnson as the ex-con cabbie is a good person for this role. He’s able to play the tough guy with a heart of gold, and I really like him in these funny, loveable roles, similar to what he played in "The Game Plan." There are plenty of action stars out there, but not so many tough guys (he’s a former wrestler) who can slide into these family movies so easily. He’s a character that movie kids can trust.

It was weird seeing Carla Gugino as the skeptical scientist, because I just saw her as an edgy broad in the R-rated "The Watchmen." But it shows that she’s a good actress who can play a variety of roles.

And the kids: AnnaSophia Robb has a huge fan base (a lot of kids in India, for some reason), and after doing some heavy-duty emotional movies ("Bridge to Terabithia" and "Sleepwalking," to name two), maybe she needed a more lighthearted movie like this one. This role didn’t seem to take much effort from her.

Alexander Ludwig doesn’t have a huge resume (he was last seen in 2007’s "The Seeker: The Dark is Rising,") but as with Robb, he’s fine in this role as the stunned alien kid trying to find his way back home.

Ciaran Hinds plays a tough federal agent who pursues the group with his army of camo’d artillery guys. He’s another actor who’s done some heavy roles, not the least of which was playing Julius Caesar in HBO’s "Rome."

There were also a few throw-away roles for some actors who should be toplining their own movies: Tom Everett Scott plays one of the agents, Cheech Marin plays a mechanic who fixes the cab, and Garry Marshall plays a big-wig UFO guy at the conference. I hope these folks didn’t do this movie because had no other roles coming their way. I hope they did it to be a part of Witch Mountain history.

Overall, this is a nice adventure movie that contains no sexual innuendos or language issues, which also makes it a fine family movie for kids 7 and older. If you’re familiar with the original movies, keep an eye out for the sheriff (Ike Eisenmann) and the waitress (Kim Richards) in the town of Stony Creek. They played the kids in the original movie!

Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen Trailer Premiere

As you may know, there was as special screening for the new Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen trailer in LA on April 29th and E.T. was there to capture the moment. They also scored some interviews with Director Michael Bay, Shia LaBeouf, and Tyrese Gibson.

Avatar Movie Poster



MORE COMING SOON!!

Race To Witch Mountain Movie Poster



Poster 2

Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen Movie Poster



Poster 2

Poster 3

Poster 4

Poster 5

Poster 6

Poster 7 NEW

Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince Movie Poster



Poster 2

Poster 3

Poster 4

Poster 5

Poster 6

Poster 7

Poster 8

New Moon Movie Poster



Poster 2

Poster 3

Poster 4

Poster 5

Poster 6

Poster 7

Poster 8

Fast & Furious 4 Movie Poster



Poster 2
Poster 3
Poster 4

Star Trek Movie Poster



Poster 2
Poster 3
Poster 4
Poster 5
Poster 6
IMAX Poster

X-Men Origins: Wolverine Movie Poster



Poster 2
Poster 3
Poster 4
Poster 5

G.I. Joe : The Rise of Cobra Movie Poster



POSTER 2
POSTER 3
POSTER 4
POSTER 5
POSTER 6

Terminator Salvation Movie Poster



Poster 2

Poster 3

Poster 4

Poster 5

Fast and Furious (2009) Review


REVIEW
Back in 2001, Vin Diesel and Paul Walker skyrocketed to potential stardom with the tremendously successful The Fast and the Furious. When it came to the bad acting bonanza of a sequel, 2 Fast 2 Furious, Walker said yes, while Diesel went on to another potential franchise xXx. For the second sequel, The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift, Walker opted out while Diesel said yes, if only for an unbilled cameo. In the time since either Walker or Diesel appeared in a Fast and Furious movie, their individual careers have been less than stellar, with Walker's only hit being Disney's Eight Below, while Diesel, still developing another Riddick movie for a character that succeeds only as a video game, scoring with family comedy The Pacifier. However, the beauty of a successful movie franchise is that it can create new movie stars, continue their careers, or, in the case of Fast & Furious, attempt to restart them.

"A lot has changed," Walker tells Diesel at one point in the movie, and he's right. Not about the intense story arc of their characters that he's referencing, but the Furious movies themselves. The last time a Fast and the Furious movie hit theaters it was set in Tokyo with a brand new lead character (Lucas Black). So how does Fast & Furious fit in? As a prequel to Tokyo Drift, taking place sequentially in the Furious canon after 2 Fast 2 Furious, but before Tokyo Drift even when Fast & Furious was made fourth. Confused? You won't be. Fast & Furious's plot is a familiar tale of revenge filled with unnecessary reasons for car chases, bad writing and simplistic acting. You know, all the things people loved about the Furious movies to begin with.

For those wondering where Diesel's character Dominic Toretto has been all these years, the answer is the Dominican Republic, where he and girlfriend Letty (Michelle Rodriguez, also looking for career rejuvenation) and a rag tag team of car driving thrill seekers (including Sung Kang as Han, the "Vin Diesel" character in Tokyo Drift) who steal gas in the movie's table-setting opening sequence. When Diesel breaks up the gang, Han heads to Tokyo. See? It all makes sense now!

Meanwhile, Walker is still hard at work with the law, and is found on a typical rooftop chase with a suspect that ends with Walker tackling his suspect for a two story drop into a car's roof that hurts neither of them. Medical improbabilities aside, a chase scene on foot? Isn't this Fast & Furious? But this is the newer, edgier Paul Walker, one with a brand new deeper voice, one that's a serious departure from his usual Southern California cadence. If you're an actor who wants to sound tough but typically sounds like a typical surfer dude, then it's best to sound like a typical surfer dude talking in a deeper voice.

When Rodriguez is killed, Diesel finds himself back in Los Angeles seeking revenge (and Coronas!) against the same man Walker is hunting down for the FBI. Reluctantly, and with only Rodriguez's death to unite them, they team up to go undercover against a drug runner.

Having directed both Fast & Furious and Tokyo Drift, director Justin Lin clearly holds the keys to the franchise (Get it? More puns on their way!), and, with the return of the original cast, has set things up reasonably well for fans. Lin follows the formula of the Furious movies pretty strictly, babes+car chases=success, pushing character development and dramatic scenes into the trunk. The babes involved this time are Jordana Brewster, back as Diesel's sister and Walker's former love interest (but maybe could be again? Fingers crossed!), and bad girl Gal Gadot, to whom Diesel gets to deliver the trailer-spoiling, best line of the movie: "I appreciate a good body regardless of the make." Still, even girls take a back seat to revenge, and the movie focuses more on the racing such as Diesel and Walker proving their worth to drug dealer Braga through a L.A. street race (which includes Lin's nod to himself when a few cars "drift" into L.A. traffic). The chase scenes are the real meat of a Furious movie, and, while it's hard to say they provide a brand new take on the car chase, do provide enough adrenaline for fans of the franchise to enjoy.

It's hard to see Fast & Furious as anything other than a chance to revitalize Diesel and Walker's careers while capitalizing on a known franchise. Fans of the original will get their money's worth, but it will hardly win over anyone who never bothered with the franchise in the first place. For those who were disappointed with 2 Fast 2 Furious and disenfranchised with Tokyo Drift, Fast & Furious is a successful return to the Furious formula, but even with the original actors in place, it's still a rather hollow movie of car chases and a few scenes of dialogue. Still, for the Furious crowd, that might just be what the mechanic ordered.

Dragonball: Evolution Review



Plot
2000 years ago a menacing alien threat named Piccolo and a destructive god named Oozaru laid waste to the earth before being imprisoned by a loyal order of monks. Now Piccolo is loose and is after the seven mystical Dragonballs, which will grant the owner a wish, and naturally Piccolo wants to destroy the earth again. It's up to Goku, a young Ki master with a secret and his scrappy band of adventurers to stop Piccolo and collect the Dragonballs.

Review
Dragonball: Evolution was no exception. Fans decried every scrap of material they could get their hands on, from leaked screencaps to shots of unpainted action figures to the teaser trailers, each time their derisive laughter and scorn growing louder and louder. A tiny handful of people remained cautiously optimistic, praying that 20th Century Fox had managed to distill the essence of the eternally popular, internationally beloved and downright legendary Dragon Ball story into a 90-minute action adventure that, while perhaps not adhering so closely to the exact plot and pacing of the original story, did provide a faithful and entertaining homage that might pave the way for increasingly loyal adaptations down the road.

Here's what happened instead: a bunch of talentless hacks with studio money slapped together a big steaming pile of baffling garbage that fails utterly on every possible level and will please no one at all.

The fans were right.

Here's how it goes: the movie opens with a brief montage about an evil alien named Piccolo and a monkey lookin’ god of destruction named Oozaru who destroyed the earth's population 2000 years ago and were sealed up by an order of monks (or something) who imprisoned Piccolo and I guess sent Oozaru away to space jail or whatever. So now it's 2000 years later and we're introduced to scrappy young Goku, who is training at his grandfather Gohan's ranch-temple-Karate dojo thing out in the country, and has trouble at high school because he's so special and different (why his classmates think he's different or weird, we are never told nor shown). After taking out some bullies (who menacingly call him “Geeko” over and over again, for no discernable reason, especially considering he looks and dresses exactly like them) he catches the eye of ChiChi, a cute girl who knows he's using his Ki power after he opens her stubborn locker for her with his amazing airbending skills. Turns out ChiChi is a fighter too, and she's totally digging on Goku's style. Love interest alert! Who'da thunk?

So then Piccolo – who has somehow broken out of imprisonment, the hows and whys of which are never explained at all - shows up in his big flying office building thing that nobody seems to notice hovering around in the clouds, crushes Gohan's karate ranch using the Power of the Force after he discovers Gohan no longer has the 4-star Dragonball. After all, he gave it to Goku for his 18th birthday, and wouldn't you know it, Goku is at ChiChi's bangin’ high school party at a McMansion in the San Fernando Valley the futuristic city of Who Cares. So Goku returns to conveniently find Gohan, just about to die, but just alive enough to tell Goku to believe in himself (among a handful of other convenient noble one-liners destined to be repeated later in the film) and that it's his destiny to sniff out all the Dragonballs he can (which, as everyone knows, will grant the ball-handler a wish when collected together), stop Piccolo from destroying the world and do it all in 90 minutes so the kids can make it home in time for Spongebob and the rest of the paying audience can drown their sorrow in a bottle of cheap whiskey while lighting their Dragon Ball manga collections on fire in front of the 20th Century Fox offices.

Then Bulma (sample dialogue: “I'm Bulma Briefs!”) shows up out of nowhere with a Dragonball detector and she and Goku become buddies, teaming up to stop Piccolo and to find Master Roshi (sample dialogue: “Punk, prepare for your clock is going to be cleaned!”), the only person who knows Goku's destiny and can train him not only to battle Piccolo, but to also assist in their quest to gently cup as many Dragonballs as possible. Along the way they run into obnoxious bandit Yamcha (sample dialogue: “Cheese and rice, my nads got scorched!”) who serves no purpose other than to deliver unfunny punchlines and become Bulma's love interest 12 hours after meeting her. There's also Piccolo's unnamed shapeshifting henchwoman, who sometimes shows up long enough to get punched, show off her terrible wig and lose a fight. After about an hour and 15 minutes Piccolo has caressed all 7 Dragonballs (and has had maybe 5 minutes of screentime total and around 4 or 5 lines, not one of which really offers a good solid reason why exactly he wants to destroy the planet), and Goku, now conveniently dressed in his trademark orange Gi and silly ribbed boots, which he managed to change into while his hovering transport jeep was exploding, Bulma, Yamcha and Roshi all show up for the big final battle. Goku turns into an embarrassing CG monkey thing for a while, there's a lot of yelling and whatnot, and then it's over. They hint at a sequel (actual dialogue: "where are the Dragonballs?" "Looks like they're gone again!" "Well, we better go find them!"), and that's about it.

There's a lot wrong with Dragonball: Evolution, but the one huge thing that overrides nearly everything else is that the script is an absolute, unmitigated disaster. It's clear that a metric ton of material was hacked out, but this thing would need another 30 minutes rise from “unforgivably retarded” to “only mostly retarded”. If you walked into this movie cold – with only a cursory knowledge of who Goku is or what the original story is about – your jaw will be agape at what unbelievable horsecrap is unfolding before you. They explain virtually nothing. There is little to no character motivation. Things just sort of happen – it's not difficult to keep up with (once you realize the movie has no internal logic at all and is just checking off character names and plot points) it's just that so little of it feels connected or sensible at all. Stuff happens, but who cares? Earth is basically unrecognizable and looks like the first 5 minutes or so of Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey, the distant future circa 1992. None of the characters are compelling or interesting at all and they're all caught up in this big nonsense story that feels like it was written in crayon. It'd probably be easy to excuse this trash pile of a script by claiming that the original material was pretty zany too, but while Dragon Ball may have been silly and overblown, it wasn't insultingly stupid and senseless. You can't even use the ‘it's a live-action cartoon!’ excuse – compared to Dragonball: Evolution, your average episode of Chowder or Batman: The Brave and the Bold are shining examples of depth and meaning on par with the work of Dostoyevsky. Kids aren't dumb enough to fall for this.

In terms of production values, nothing there works either. The special effects are all Sci-Fi Original Movie-level quality, and the costume design is questionable to say the least. Hell, even the makeup sucks – Bulma has cosmetics plastered on like a whore in a Ratt video, all heavy rouge and electric blue eyeliner, her hair teased and highlighted to where she'd look much more comfortable writhing around on the hood of a 1987 TransAm than playing a “badass” genius scientist. The film's climactic moment – spoiler alert, it's the Kamehameha – is so outrageously goofy looking and badly executed that you will laugh out loud. It is perhaps the most enjoyable moment in the film, unintentionally so.

It's hard to blame the actors for their across-the-board mediocre performances when they're dealing with material this mind-boggling, but they can't be let off the hook either. Justin Chatwin occasionally delivers his ridiculous dialogue with some measure of quality but most of the film requires him to grimace and flex his neck muscles, which he apparently isn't quite capable of doing in a convincing way; imagine someone doing a bad job at faking "desperate, painful constipation" and you're about there. Emily Rossum spits her lines out like she just can't wait to get rid of them, and nobody can blame her for that, but she's less engaging than your average Power Rangers guest star. The guy playing Yamcha – Joon Park – is just not very good at this. His delivery is godawful, like the guy who's stuck playing the tired ‘surfer dude’ stereotype character in a Japanese roleplaying game from 1997, back when they'd hire convenience store employees and hobos from the local YMCA to do the voiceover work. Chow Yun-Fat does what he can, but even he stumbles over this stuff; the role requires him to behave like a cartoon character and it just comes across as trying way, way too hard.

In the end, it all boils down to one thing: this movie appeals to nobody. It was made for no one. People who aren't familiar with the Dragon Ball story at all will be so flabbergasted by what's happening that they will likely tell everyone they know that it's one of the worst movies they've ever seen. Fans who do know what the general story is will be furious at just how unbelievably badly they screwed this entire thing up. Kids are used to better writing than this in their weekday afternoon cartoons (although you may run into a kid who has never actually seen a movie before, and they might dig it until you show them another movie). It's a clunky, tiresome, badly executed, horribly written pile of shame that deserves no quarter.

In short, it's as bad as the fans said it would be.

X-Men Origins: Wolverine Review



Plot

Popular X-Men character Wolverine (Hugh Jackman), is a member of an elite military squadron, lead by the wholly unscrupulous William Stryker. But when he tries to break away from his violent past and settle down with his one true love, his past comes back to haunt him in the worst way imaginable. Now, on a mission to avenge the death of his lover, Wolverine hunts down his sadistic half brother Sabretooth (Liev Schreiber), only to discover that they have both become pawns in a game far bigger and darker than they could have imagined.





Review

Following the disastrous instalment that was X-Men: The Last Stand, I had very low expectations of this film from the beginning. Because of that I believe, I was thoroughly surprised to find myself watching an action packed, enjoyable entry for the X-Men universe.

Whilst it must be said that Fox are guilty on some level of including characters without rhyme or reason (Gambit anyone?), all in all the film made a decent effort at trying to claw back some of the respect earned from “X-Men” and “X2” (pun intended).

Hugh Jackman reprised his role as the feral mutant outcast “Logan” with relative ease, and despite what some critics have said, I believe he did so very successfully. Watching his character evolve into the man we would come to recognise as the brutal cage fighter from the opening scenes in “X-Men” was a joy to behold, only stifled from time-to-time by the lack of chemistry between Wolverine and Silverfox (Lynn Collins).

Whilst on the subject of chemistry, it must be said that Liev Schreiber’s turn as Sabretooth was damn near note perfect. The on-screen battles between Jackman and Schreiber were without a doubt the highlight of the film, and delivered scenes that fans have been waiting to see since forever. The only question that remains is how does Schreiber’s wicked character go from being a sadistic narcissist to the dumb, hairy mute found in 2000’s “X-Men”.

The primary shortcoming of this movie and the main point of contention for so many film critics is the sheer number of characters battling for screen time in the 107 minute production. Whilst certain mutants in the story are entirely necessary in order to tell Wolverine’s tale properly, others have seemingly been thrown in simply to satisfy fans that are still pissed off from the last film. Ironically, it’s because of that very fact that the last film failed to satisfy so miserably.

Three such examples I’ll highlight here are Gambit (Taylor Kitsch), Emma Frost (Tahyna Tozzi) and Scott Summers (Scott Summers).

Gambit is a character that X-Men fans have been screaming for since the first movie was announced in the 90’s, and that seems to be the only reason he’s been included here at all. Rather than alluding to the characters complex back-story, Gambit is reduced to a supportive, semi-comic role as an escapee and a bit of a poker player. Emma Frost, known to X-Fans as the White Queen, is portrayed in the film more as a “beige princess,” with little or no real contribution to the story at all. Scott Summers, aka Cyclops, appears as a ham-handed way for Fox and producer Laura Schuler Donner to shoehorn us into the planned “X-Men: First Class” franchise.

That, and the clunky CGI have all added up to wholly negative reviews of the film, but I implore you not to let such minor issues take away from what this film does deliver.

What does it deliver? Sheer unbridled entertainment, from beginning to end.

X-Men Origins: Wolverine is a film divided. On one side you have the fan-friendly plot, and on the other you have the business minded studio execs, each butting heads with one another. Whilst it’d be true to say that all in all Wolverine promises what it set out to do, I’m also mindful of the fact that the studio have had to make huge sacrifices in the character’s story in order to clumsily fit this film in with the X-Men trilogy.

That being said, I believe that Wolverine is a thoroughly enjoyable instalment in the X-Men franchise.

Rating – 7/10 – Good Popcorn Movie

Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen Trailer Preview

A preview at the trailer for Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen from E.T. which will debut tomorrow.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Soderbergh Gives Avatar High Praise

Earlier today,We had a rare opportunity for an extended interview with filmmaker Steven Soderbergh for his upcoming film The Girlfriend Experience, a timely film about a high-priced Manhattan escort played by adult video star Sasha Grey.

We had a chance to talk to Soderbergh at length about the film as well as his next two studio projects, The Informant and Moneyball, which reunite him with Matt Damon and Brad Pitt, respectively, but the real surprise came at the end of our conversation.

We were asking why he thought recent films didn't have quite the impact or longevity as the classics, and he gave us a great response about how the volume of movies being made and seen made it hard for anything to have the cultural impact of a movie like The Godfather or be remembered. He was disappointed there weren't those sorts of benchmarks in the movies being made today, but he surprised us by adding that he thought James Cameron's Avatar would be one of those benchmarks:

"I've seen some stuff and holy sh*t. It's the craziest sh*t ever. That could negate everything I just said," he told us.

A lot of people are eagerly anticipating the film, being that it's Cameron's first narrative feature film since Titanic way back in 1997, but nothing has been seen of the movie beyond a poster and a brief report from TIME last month. To have a reputable and discerning filmmaker like Soderbergh give it such high praise certainly makes one optimistic that Cameron's return will be the stuff of cinematic legend.

Check out more about Avatar here

Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian TV Spot #2


Release Date: May 22, 2009 (conventional theaters and IMAX)
Studio: 20th Century Fox
Director: Shawn Levy
Screenwriter: Robert Ben Garant, Thomas Lennon
Starring: Ben Stiller, Amy Adams, Owen Wilson, Hank Azaria, Christopher Guest, Alain Chabat, Robin Williams
Genre: Adventure, Comedy
Plot Summary: It's a new "Night" and "Museum" for Ben Stiller, who is joined by several other stars from the original film, as well as new characters from history -- including Amy Adams as famed aviatrix Amelia Earhart, Hank Azaria as villainous Egyptian pharaoh Kahmunrah, Christopher Guest as Russian tyrant Ivan the Terrible and Alain Chabat as Napoleon. Owen Wilson is back as cowboy Jedediah, and Robin Williams again rides into history as Teddy Roosevelt. The centerpiece of the film will be bringing to life the Smithsonian Institution, which houses the world's largest museum complex with more than 136 million items in its collections, ranging from the plane Amelia Earhart flew on her nonstop solo flight across the Atlantic and Al Capone's rap sheet and mug shot to Dorothy's ruby red slippers and Archie Bunker's lounge chair. No major film has ever shot inside the Smithsonian in Washington...until "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian." The "Battle" begins in theaters everywhere May 22.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

The Expendables Behind the Scenes


The production Blog for Sylvester Stallone's The Expendables has posted this new behind-the-scenes video featuring several scenes being filmed for the action film. Opening April 23, 2010, the movie follows a team of mercenaries on a mission to overthrow a South American dictator.

Stallone, Terry Crews, Randy Couture, Eric Roberts, Mickey Rourke, Jet Li, Jason Statham, Dolph Lundgren, Charisma Carpenter, Giselle Itie, Brittany Murphy and David Zayas star in the Lionsgate release.

Angels & Demons: TV Spot #7


Director:Ron Howard
Writers (WGA):David Koepp (screenplay) and Akiva Goldsman (screenplay)
Release Date:15 May 2009 (USA) more
Genre:Crime | Drama | Mystery | Thriller
Tagline:The holiest event of our time. Perfect for their return.
Plot:The team behind the global phenomenon "The Da Vinci Code" returns for the highly anticipated "Angels & Demons," based upon the bestselling novel by Dan Brown. Tom Hanks reprises his role as Harvard religious expert Robert Langdon, who once again finds that forces with ancient roots are willing to stop at nothing, even murder, to advance their goals. Ron Howard again directs the film, which is produced by Brian Grazer, Ron Howard, and John Calley. The screenplay is by David Koepp and Akiva Goldsman.

Battle for Terra TV Spot


Release Date: May 1, 2009
Studio: Roadside Attractions
Director: Aristomenis Tsirbas
Screenwriter: Evan Spiliotopoulos
Starring: Justin Long, Brian Cox, Evan Rachel Wood, Luke Wilson, David Cross, Amanda Peet, James Garner, Dennis Quaid, Chris Evans, Danny Glover
Genre: Animation, Adventure
Plot Summary: The film tells the story of Senn (Justin Long) and Mala (Evan Rachel Wood), two rebellious alien teens living on the beautiful planet Terra, a place that promotes peace and tolerance, having long ago rejected war and weapons of mass destruction. But when Terra is invaded by human beings fleeing a civil war and environmental catastrophe, the planet is plunged into chaos. During the upheaval, Mala befriends an injured human pilot (Luke Wilson) and each learns the two races are not so different from one another. Together they must face the terrifying realization that in a world of limited resources, only one of their races is likely to survive.

Star Trek 3 New TV Spots


Release Date: May 8, 2009 (conventional theaters and IMAX)
Studio: Paramount Pictures
Director: J.J. Abrams
Screenwriter: Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman
Starring: John Cho, Ben Cross, Bruce Greenwood, Simon Pegg, Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Winona Ryder, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, Anton Yelchin, Eric Bana, Leonard Nimoy
Genre: Sci-Fi
From director J.J. Abrams ("Mission: Impossible III," "Lost" and "Alias") and screenwriters Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman ("Transformers," "MI: III") comes a new vision of the greatest space adventure of all time, "Star Trek," featuring a young, new crew venturing boldly where no man has gone before.Set before "The Original Series" Kirk and Spock are newly graduated Cadets fresh from Starfleet Acadamey and are sent on their first space mission.

Check out Star Trek TV SPOT #9 & #10 Here

X-Men Origins: Wolverine 3 New TV Spots


Release Date: May 1, 2009
Studio: 20th Century Fox
Director: Gavin Hood
Screenwriter: David Benioff
Starring: Hugh Jackman, Liev Schreiber, Ryan Reynolds, Taylor Kitsch, Will.i.am, Danny Huston, Dominic Monaghan, Daniel Henney, Lynn Collins
Genre: Action, Drama, Fantasy, Sci-Fi, Thriller
Plot Summary: Leading up to the events of "X-Men," "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" tells the story of Wolverine's epically violent and romantic past, his complex relationship with Victor Creed, and the ominous Weapon X program. Along the way, Wolverine encounters many mutants, both familiar and new, including surprise appearances by several legends of the X-Men universe.


Check out X-Men Origins: Wolverine TV SPOT #14 & 15 HERE

Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian TV Spot


Release Date: May 22, 2009 (conventional theaters and IMAX)
Studio: 20th Century Fox
Director: Shawn Levy
Screenwriter: Robert Ben Garant, Thomas Lennon
Starring: Ben Stiller, Amy Adams, Owen Wilson, Hank Azaria, Christopher Guest, Alain Chabat, Robin Williams
Genre: Adventure, Comedy
Plot Summary: It's a new "Night" and "Museum" for Ben Stiller, who is joined by several other stars from the original film, as well as new characters from history -- including Amy Adams as famed aviatrix Amelia Earhart, Hank Azaria as villainous Egyptian pharaoh Kahmunrah, Christopher Guest as Russian tyrant Ivan the Terrible and Alain Chabat as Napoleon. Owen Wilson is back as cowboy Jedediah, and Robin Williams again rides into history as Teddy Roosevelt. The centerpiece of the film will be bringing to life the Smithsonian Institution, which houses the world's largest museum complex with more than 136 million items in its collections, ranging from the plane Amelia Earhart flew on her nonstop solo flight across the Atlantic and Al Capone's rap sheet and mug shot to Dorothy's ruby red slippers and Archie Bunker's lounge chair. No major film has ever shot inside the Smithsonian in Washington...until "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian." The "Battle" begins in theaters everywhere May 22.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Terminator Salvation 3 NEW TV Spots


Release Date: May 21, 2009
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
Director: McG
Screenwriter: Michael Ferris, John Brancato, Paul Haggis, Jonathan Nolan, Shaun Ryan, Anthony Zuiker
Starring: Christian Bale, Sam Worthington, Anton Yelchin, Bryce Dallas Howard, Moon Bloodgood, Common
Genre: Action, Sci-Fi
Plot Summary: In the highly anticipated new installment of "The Terminator" film franchise, set in post-apocalyptic 2018, Christian Bale stars as John Connor, the man fated to lead the human resistance against Skynet and its army of Terminators. But the future Connor was raised to believe in is altered in part by the appearance of Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington), a stranger whose last memory is of being on death row. Connor must decide whether Marcus has been sent from the future, or rescued from the past. As Skynet prepares its final onslaught, Connor and Marcus both embark on an odyssey that takes them into the heart of Skynet's operations, where they uncover the terrible secret behind the possible annihilation of mankind.
Check out Terminator Salvation TV Spot #7 & #8 here

New Moon Entertainment Tonight Preview V & VI


New Moon Entertainment Tonight Preview IV


VIEW MORE HERE

James Cameron’s Avatar

An interview with James Cameron who discusses the technology they’re employing for shooting the film. Here are a few quotes from the director that they posted from the issue:

“We’ve eliminated the animation from animation.”

“With the capture technologies we developed, the actor can be any character they can imagine and the director can create any world, any time and any space.”

Cameron also talked about having Peter Jackson and Stephen Spielberg on set and letting them play around with the camera.

“I invited them over while shooting AVATAR. I put the camera in their hands and they basically became two kids - on the inside every filmmaker is really just a complete geek. The amazing thing for me was just watching that seminal moment. They were running around the stage, working the camera, and that’s the moment when they both kind of looked at each other in the eye and said, ‘Let’s make TINTIN.’”

Michael at MarketSaw was also able to confirm that there will not be a trailer for Avatar attached to X-Men Origins: Wolverine which opens Friday, May 1st - this had been rumored earlier. Hopefully we get one soon.

Avatar is of course helmed by James Cameron and it stars Sigourney Weaver, Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldana, Michelle Rodriguez, Giovanni Ribisi, Stephen Lang, Peter Mensah and Wes Studi.

What do you think of what we know about the movie so far?


HERE'S A FAN TRAILER OF AVATAR

Terminator Salvation TV Spot #7 & #8


Sunday, April 26, 2009

Star Trek TV SPOT #9 & #10


X-Men Origins: Wolverine TV Spot #14 & 15


Saturday, April 25, 2009

Star Trek Featurette - Hunks of Star Trek


Release Date: May 8, 2009 (conventional theaters and IMAX)
Studio: Paramount Pictures
Director: J.J. Abrams
Screenwriter: Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman
Starring: John Cho, Ben Cross, Bruce Greenwood, Simon Pegg, Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Winona Ryder, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, Anton Yelchin, Eric Bana, Leonard Nimoy
Genre: Sci-Fi
From director J.J. Abrams ("Mission: Impossible III," "Lost" and "Alias") and screenwriters Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman ("Transformers," "MI: III") comes a new vision of the greatest space adventure of all time, "Star Trek," featuring a young, new crew venturing boldly where no man has gone before.Set before "The Original Series" Kirk and Spock are newly graduated Cadets fresh from Starfleet Acadamey and are sent on their first space mission.

New Moon Entertainment Tonight Preview III


Release Date: November 20, 2009
Studio: Summit Entertainment
Director: Chris Weitz
Screenwriter: Melissa Rosenberg
Starring: Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Taylor Lautner, Ashley Greene, Peter Facinelli, Elizabeth Reaser, Kellan Lutz, Nikki Reed, Jackson Rathbone, Edi Gathegi, Rachelle Lafevre, Billy Burke, Charlie Bewley, Jamie Campbell Bower, Daniel Cudmore, Christopher Heyerdahl, Dakota Fanning, Cameron Bright, Noot Seer, Michael Sheen, Graham Greene, Tinsel Korey
Genre: Romance, Thriller
Plot Summary: In "New Moon," Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) is devastated by the abrupt departure of her vampire love Edward (Robert Pattinson) but her spirit is rekindled by her growing friendship with the irresistible Jacob Black (Taylor Lautner). Suddenly she finds herself drawn into the world of the werewolves, ancestral enemies of the vampires, and she finds her loyalties tested.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Schwarzenegger Talks Terminator Salvation Cameo

In a recent webcast interview, Schwarzenegger talked about his proposed cameo in Salvation. One bit of info he gave was pretty conflicting: he said he met with the director (McG) and agreed to be in the film, so long as he didn’t have to perform.

I’m sorry, Arnie… what?…

Turns out Schwarzenegger was referring to the question of whether or not it would be actually him who appeared in the film, or just his face, which McG has said he wanted to superimpose over the body of T-800 Terminator model using CGI. That technological leap would allow the Governator to appear in the movie without, you know… actually appearing in the movie. Here’s what “Ahnuld” had to say:

“I made it very clear that I don’t have the time to do the movie… I said that I would be willing to be in the movie if they get the technology together, and so they are working on that right now.”

He also gave his thoughts on the overall idea of adding to the existing franchise, as well as his future therein:

“I think it’s cool to continue on with the franchise … in case I want to jump over again and get into the acting after I’m through here.”

It appears that although Schwarzenegger doesn’t want to act right now (mainly because he doesn’t have the time because of the current position he holds) that doesn’t mean he wouldn’t be open to the idea of returning to the acting profession once his term in office runs out in about two years time. He does mention it in the above quote, so I think we can color the possibility of seeing him on-screen in more than just a cameo at some point in the future as quite likely.

Last week we learned that the scene where Arnie’s face would appear would be a fight scene with a naked T-800 (who, of course, was his character in the first three movies). In it we would mostly see him from the back, presumably to hide the fact that it’s not actually him (instead it will be Roland Kickinger taking his place).

It seems that they are trying everything they can to get Arnie in there for a cameo, just as a teasing Easter-egg to movie buffs everywhere. Does it really matter if Arnie’s in there? Not really, but it would be very cool. If it isn’t a case of the cameo disrupting the story and is rather just a little added bonus appearance then I see no problem with it.

Slap a Schwarzenegger face on this ‘bot and we’re good to go!
As for how they’re going to have him in there, I am very much for employing the technology needed to impose him rather than actually have him in there in person. Schwarzenegger is 62 years old this year, and that, coupled with the fact he’s been out of the movie game for five years now, means he won’t be in the same condition physically as he used to be. Even in Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines he was pushing it.

With an approximate $200 million budget, I’m sure that they can find a technological way to get Arnie in T4, one way or another. I think we would all agree that it would be very cool to see him back on-screen again, no matter what role he took, but even cooler to see him as the badass machine we all know and love.

What do you think of Schwarzenegger possibly making a cameo in Terminator Salvation? Would you rather have him appear in person, or is the GGI route the better way to go?

Terminator Salvation opens on May 21st in the US and on June 3rd in the UK this year.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

New Moon Entertainment Tonight Preview


Harry Potter’s ‘Deathly Hallows’ Is Two Movies


We’ve not even seen the release of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince yet (although we would have if Warner Bros. hadn’t have delayed it…), and yet there’s already talk about the next and last film in the successful series.

It was announced over a year ago by WB that Deathly Hallows is going to be split into two separate movies because, as franchise producer David Heyman stated back then:
“[The last book] is so rich, the story so dense and there is so much that is resolved that after discussing it with Jo [Rowling], we came to the conclusion that two parts were needed to do it justice.”
Now over a year on, courtesy of Empire, we have some new info on the matter. In an interview with Harry Potter himself, Daniel Radcliffe, along with Heyman, explained how the film is going to be split (sort of…):

“We’ve played around with a couple of places… and ultimately settled on a place that we think is very exciting, and I think quite bold, in that it’s not necessarily where one might expect. You want to give a sense of completion, on one hand, but a sense that there’s another piece, more to come. We tried one and then Steve (Kloves, screenwriter) came up with the idea to try it another way and when we tried that, it felt just right.”
Radcliffe chimed it in with a clue-like piece of info, for those who have read the book(s), by saying the first part will end on a major cliffhanger of some sort.

When looking ahead to how they were going to deal with the later part of the last book [possible spoilers ahead about the Deathly Hallows book and story], Radcliffe and Heyman noted that it takes place almost 20 years later, and they discussed how they would like that to be portrayed on-screen - Heyman is keen to employ the revolutionary technology used for The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, but Radcliffe wasn’t so keen on that idea:

“I am nervous about that because if it’s good I’ll be really, really pleased; if it’s not good and that’s what people are left with, that would be awful. If it’s a choice between having me, Rupert [Grint] and Emma [Watson] looking a bit stupid and it being slightly comical or having other actors play us, I would go for other actors every time. So, we’ll see.”

I look at this in two ways: on the one hand I can see the need to split Deathly Hallows into two parts - Not only going by what this experienced franchise producer says, but also on the word of those who have read and are mega fans of the books. The last book is very heavy and detail-laden (as I expect most, if not all, of them are, but this one even more so), and let’s not forget this is the closing out of a long running and very successful franchise, and WB may want to “do it justice,” as Heyman said last year.

If there’s just so much in there that doing it one film, even if it were to have a longer run-time than the others, will only feel rushed and unsatisfying, then for the sake of making it high quality they simply have to split it into two… if that’s what’s needed.

However, on the other hand (and I’m sure a lot of fans out there lean more towards this angle) this may just be a sly move on WB’s part to get fans to pay $20 instead of $10 to see how the franchise concludes. I’m sure WB knows that they have something very valuable on their hands with the Harry Potter franchise, and this splitting move could be looked at as them just wanting to make as much money as possible before there’s no Harry Potter’s left to make.

Ultimately, from a purely story-telling point of view, I actually think splitting Deathly Hallows into two parts might be not be too bad of an idea. As I said, if it needs the extra time then by all means it should be given it, and that ultimately would make for a better overall viewing experience in that things don’t feel rushed, incomplete and ultimately unsatisfying.

There’s also the reason of us getting more movies out of the franchise… that’s nothing but a good thing…

The information given in the above interview obviously seems vague to someone who only knows these stories through the movie versions, but it sounds like they’re at least giving some serious thought as to how to do it right. Hopefully, anyway…

What are your thoughts on Deathly Hallows being split into two parts? And what about the possibility of using the Benjamin Button technology?

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part I is currently scheduled for a November 19th, 2010 release and Part 2 is currently scheduled for a July 15th, 2011 release.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is being released on July 15th this year.
Source: Empire